Home / Compare / Chapman University vs Loyola Marymount University-Los Angeles
Chapman University vs Loyola Marymount University-Los Angeles
Chapman University Law School · Orange, CA | Loyola Marymount University-Los Angeles Law School · Los Angeles, CA
This pairing is listed because these two schools are same state, similar selectivity in California — the circumstances in which one school is a realistic alternative to the other.
Side by side
All figures from the 2025 ABA 509 reporting cycle. Bold marks the stronger figure on each row where a direction exists.
| Measure | Chapman University | Loyola Marymount University-Los Angeles | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acceptance rate | 20.53% | 26.05% | −5.5 |
| Median LSAT | 163 | 163 | identical |
| Median GPA | 3.7 | 3.74 | −0 |
| Annual tuition | $63,126 | $70,360 | −7,234 |
| 3-year total cost | $288,471 | $343,248 | −54,777 |
| Median grant / year | $59,500 | $45,000 | +14,500 |
| Net tuition after grant | not reported | not reported | — |
| First-year class size | 153 | 338 | −185 |
| Offer yield | not reported | not reported | — |
| Class fill | 99.3% | 98.5% | +0.8 |
| Bar pass (1st time) | 80.3% | 79.7% | +0.6 |
Bold is not a recommendation. On cost and acceptance it marks the lower number; on grant aid and bar passage the higher one. Where no direction applies — median LSAT, GPA and class size — nothing is bolded, because a higher median LSAT is not obviously better than a lower one for a given applicant.
Where the two differ most
Ranked by the size of the gap relative to Loyola Marymount University-Los Angeles's figure. These are the differences most likely to change a decision.
| Measure | Chapman University | Loyola Marymount University-Los Angeles | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| First-year class size | 153 | 338 | −185 |
| Median grant / year | $59,500 | $45,000 | +14,500in dollars |
| Acceptance rate | 20.53% | 26.05% | −5.5percentage points |
| 3-year total cost | $288,471 | $343,248 | −54,777in dollars |
Cost compared
Both schools report tuition, mandatory fees and living costs, so a full three-year figure can be computed for each. This is the comparison that tuition-only rankings cannot make.
| Component (per year) | Chapman University | Loyola Marymount University-Los Angeles |
|---|---|---|
| Annual tuition | $63,126 | $70,360 |
| 3-year total cost | $288,471 | $343,248 |
| Median grant / year | $59,500 | $45,000 |
| Net tuition after median grant | — | — |
Net tuition subtracts the median grant from annual tuition. It is an optimistic floor: the median covers only students who received aid, and it assumes the same award holds for all three years. See the full cost ranking for every school.
Outcomes compared
| Measure | Chapman University | Loyola Marymount University-Los Angeles |
|---|---|---|
| First-time bar passage | 80.3% | 79.7% |
| Offer yield | 29.5% | 28.1% |
| Class fill | 99.3% | 98.5% |
| Students enrolled | 152 | 333 |
| First-year class size | 153 | 338 |
The national median offer yield is 31.6%. Offer yield measures how many admitted students chose each school; class fill measures whether the class was filled. A low yield is common and usually reflects a wide offer policy rather than a school students avoid.
Choosing between them
- There is no better school here, only a different one. These figures describe cohort averages. Where your own profile falls relative to a school's admitted range matters more than any published median.
- Cost is a family question, not a ranking. The three-year figure covers tuition, fees and published living costs. It does not include books, a laptop, travel home, or the income lost to three years of not working.
- Grant figures are history, not offers. Both medians describe past cohorts. Your award depends on your circumstances, the school's policy and its aid budget that year.
- Bar passage is heavily shaped by selectivity. A school that admits broadly and passes fewer of its own admittees is not necessarily providing a weaker education; the comparison is confounded by who each school chooses.
Full details on each school
| Chapman University | Loyola Marymount University-Los Angeles | |
|---|---|---|
| Admissions data | All Chapman University admissions data | All Loyola Marymount University-Los Angeles admissions data |
| Admissions funnel | Funnel & yield | Funnel & yield |
| Financial aid | Grants & aid bands | Grants & aid bands |
| Cost | Cost of attendance | Cost of attendance |
Other comparisons
Other Loyola Marymount University-Los Angeles pairings, and other alternatives to Chapman University.
- No further pairings available for these two schools.
Common questions
What is the acceptance rate at Chapman University vs Loyola Marymount University-Los Angeles?
Chapman University admitted 20.53% of applicants while Loyola Marymount University-Los Angeles admitted 26.05%.
Which is cheaper, Chapman University or Loyola Marymount University-Los Angeles?
Over three years, Chapman University costs $54,777 less. Chapman University runs $288,471 and Loyola Marymount University-Los Angeles runs $343,248, including tuition, mandatory fees and disclosed living costs.
Which school offers more financial aid, Chapman University or Loyola Marymount University-Los Angeles?
Chapman University reports a median grant of $59,500 per year for full-time students, compared with $45,000 at Loyola Marymount University-Los Angeles. Median figures describe past cohorts and are not aid offers.
Source: ABA Standard 509 Required Disclosures, 2025 reporting cycle, for Chapman University Law School and Loyola Marymount University-Los Angeles Law School. Three-year cost totals multiply one year of disclosed tuition, mandatory fees and living costs by three; the 509 does not disclose program length. Figures describe the most recent entering class and past aid cohorts. Not financial advice and not a recommendation of either school.