Home / Compare / California-Los Angeles vs Loyola Marymount University-Los Angeles
California-Los Angeles vs Loyola Marymount University-Los Angeles
University of California-Los Angeles Law School · Los Angeles, CA | Loyola Marymount University-Los Angeles Law School · Los Angeles, CA
This pairing is listed because these two schools are same city in Los Angeles — the circumstances in which one school is a realistic alternative to the other.
Side by side
All figures from the 2025 ABA 509 reporting cycle. Bold marks the stronger figure on each row where a direction exists.
| Measure | California-Los Angeles | Loyola Marymount University-Los Angeles | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acceptance rate | 12.05% | 26.05% | −14.0 |
| Median LSAT | 171 | 163 | +8 |
| Median GPA | 3.95 | 3.74 | +0 |
| Annual tuition | $59,084 | $70,360 | −11,276 |
| 3-year total cost | $305,724 | $343,248 | −37,524 |
| Median grant / year | $24,456 | $45,000 | −20,544 |
| Net tuition after grant | not reported | not reported | — |
| First-year class size | 328 | 338 | −10 |
| Offer yield | not reported | not reported | — |
| Class fill | 98.2% | 98.5% | −0.3 |
| Bar pass (1st time) | 96.7% | 79.7% | +16.9 |
Bold is not a recommendation. On cost and acceptance it marks the lower number; on grant aid and bar passage the higher one. Where no direction applies — median LSAT, GPA and class size — nothing is bolded, because a higher median LSAT is not obviously better than a lower one for a given applicant.
Where the two differ most
Ranked by the size of the gap relative to Loyola Marymount University-Los Angeles's figure. These are the differences most likely to change a decision.
| Measure | California-Los Angeles | Loyola Marymount University-Los Angeles | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acceptance rate | 12.05% | 26.05% | −14.0percentage points |
| Median grant / year | $24,456 | $45,000 | −20,544in dollars |
| Bar pass (1st time) | 96.7% | 79.7% | +16.9 |
| Annual tuition | $59,084 | $70,360 | −11,276in dollars |
Cost compared
Both schools report tuition, mandatory fees and living costs, so a full three-year figure can be computed for each. This is the comparison that tuition-only rankings cannot make.
| Component (per year) | California-Los Angeles | Loyola Marymount University-Los Angeles |
|---|---|---|
| Annual tuition | $59,084 | $70,360 |
| 3-year total cost | $305,724 | $343,248 |
| Median grant / year | $24,456 | $45,000 |
| Net tuition after median grant | — | — |
Net tuition subtracts the median grant from annual tuition. It is an optimistic floor: the median covers only students who received aid, and it assumes the same award holds for all three years. See the full cost ranking for every school.
Outcomes compared
| Measure | California-Los Angeles | Loyola Marymount University-Los Angeles |
|---|---|---|
| First-time bar passage | 96.7% | 79.7% |
| Offer yield | 31.0% | 28.1% |
| Class fill | 98.2% | 98.5% |
| Students enrolled | 322 | 333 |
| First-year class size | 328 | 338 |
The national median offer yield is 31.6%. Offer yield measures how many admitted students chose each school; class fill measures whether the class was filled. A low yield is common and usually reflects a wide offer policy rather than a school students avoid.
Choosing between them
- There is no better school here, only a different one. These figures describe cohort averages. Where your own profile falls relative to a school's admitted range matters more than any published median.
- Cost is a family question, not a ranking. The three-year figure covers tuition, fees and published living costs. It does not include books, a laptop, travel home, or the income lost to three years of not working.
- Grant figures are history, not offers. Both medians describe past cohorts. Your award depends on your circumstances, the school's policy and its aid budget that year.
- Bar passage is heavily shaped by selectivity. A school that admits broadly and passes fewer of its own admittees is not necessarily providing a weaker education; the comparison is confounded by who each school chooses.
Full details on each school
| California-Los Angeles | Loyola Marymount University-Los Angeles | |
|---|---|---|
| Admissions data | All California-Los Angeles admissions data | All Loyola Marymount University-Los Angeles admissions data |
| Admissions funnel | Funnel & yield | Funnel & yield |
| Financial aid | Grants & aid bands | Grants & aid bands |
| Cost | Cost of attendance | Cost of attendance |
Other comparisons
Other Loyola Marymount University-Los Angeles pairings, and other alternatives to California-Los Angeles.
- No further pairings available for these two schools.
Common questions
What is the acceptance rate at California-Los Angeles vs Loyola Marymount University-Los Angeles?
California-Los Angeles admitted 12.05% of applicants while Loyola Marymount University-Los Angeles admitted 26.05%.
Which is cheaper, California-Los Angeles or Loyola Marymount University-Los Angeles?
Over three years, California-Los Angeles costs $37,524 less. California-Los Angeles runs $305,724 and Loyola Marymount University-Los Angeles runs $343,248, including tuition, mandatory fees and disclosed living costs.
Which school offers more financial aid, California-Los Angeles or Loyola Marymount University-Los Angeles?
California-Los Angeles reports a median grant of $24,456 per year for full-time students, compared with $45,000 at Loyola Marymount University-Los Angeles. Median figures describe past cohorts and are not aid offers.
Source: ABA Standard 509 Required Disclosures, 2025 reporting cycle, for University of California-Los Angeles Law School and Loyola Marymount University-Los Angeles Law School. Three-year cost totals multiply one year of disclosed tuition, mandatory fees and living costs by three; the 509 does not disclose program length. Figures describe the most recent entering class and past aid cohorts. Not financial advice and not a recommendation of either school.